[LLVMdev] Unwinds Gone Wild

Jonathan S. Shapiro shap at eros-os.com
Mon Sep 29 18:22:06 PDT 2008


On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 17:37 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> Ok, but, realize that in order to be platform abi compatible with gcc/g 
> ++, one _must_ do certain things.  If you had a totally different  
> scheme that didn't interoperate with gcc/g++, then, you break the  
> platform abi.  If one can throw out such compatibility, then, well, it  
> just doesn't matter.

Yep.

Since I'm going to need to deal with this charming ball of barbed wire
in the BitC documentation, are there any good pointers toward things I
need to get my head around concerning libunwind?


shap




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list