[LLVMdev] Validating LLVM

Óscar Fuentes ofv at wanadoo.es
Tue Nov 11 23:00:58 PST 2008

Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> writes:


> All four of the above should be run on at least a nightly basis (more  
> frequently for some, like the regression tests). Each of these are  
> automated, making that easy. If there are no regressions from the  
> above four, we could tag that revision as being potentially "valid".

If a new test case is created (coming from a bug report or a code
review, not from adding a new feature) and it fails for a previously
"valid" revision, is the tag removed?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list