[LLVMdev] -loop-deletion commandline option inconsistent?

Tanya M. Lattner tonic at nondot.org
Tue May 13 14:18:12 PDT 2008


>> the newly added LoopDeletion pass uses loop-deletion as it's name (and thus
>> commandline option for opt). Looking at the other loop passes (loop-rotate,
>> loop-unroll, loop-reduce), perhaps loop-delete would be a better name?
> No opinions on this? If this is ever going to be changed, it's probably a good
> idea to do it before the 2.3 release, not after...

2.3 has already branched and loop delete is not on by default. This can be 
changed after.

-Tanya

>
> Gr.
>
> Matthijs
>



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list