[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM

[Michael T. Richter]

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 15:49 +1000, kr512 wrote:

> Emilio Wuerges wrote:
> > Is this thread suposed to be a bad joke?
> 
> That is a very unprofessional response ...



> Terence Parr wrote:
> > Yeah, i'm kinda freaked out as i'm sure it's not a joke. 
> > i'm in awe. +1 to kill thread before google spiders it.



> Again, that is a very unprofessional response.


You may need to invest in a dictionary and look up what the word
"professional" means.  (Hint: it involves payment.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=professional)

The people on this list?  Are (mostly) volunteers contributing time and
effort to the project.  Your demands are not ... exactly being
professional.

There's two phrases from various sides of pop culture which could apply
to you right now:

      * Show me the code!
      * Show me the money!


Without one or the other of the above, you are contributing nothing but
noise and smoke to this project.



> Another unprofessional response.
> 
> That was an unprofessional response as well.


-- 
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter at gmail.com)
Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works
and you don't know why. (Hermann Hesse)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080513/19a7f77f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080513/19a7f77f/attachment.sig>