[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM

[Michael T. Richter]

On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 16:55 +1000, kr512 wrote:

> The Solution:
> Make LLVM usable as a DLL or SLL in Windoze, capable of 
> generating a finished ready-to-execute .EXE or .DLL file, 
> without requiring that MinGW or Cygwin be installed first.


You will be welcomed with open arms by the LLVM community when you write
this.  I look forward to your announcement with bated breath.

-- 
Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter at gmail.com> (GoogleTalk:
ttmrichter at gmail.com)
I have to wonder why people think that when they can't manage local
personnel within easy strangling and shooting distance, then they can
manage personnel thousands of miles away that have different languages,
cultures, and business rules. (Joe Celko)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080513/2eb8a7ab/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080513/2eb8a7ab/attachment.sig>