[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?

Tanya Lattner tonic at nondot.org
Mon Mar 10 00:28:30 PDT 2008

On Mar 9, 2008, at 6:26 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:

> Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 15:11 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner:
>>>> A -noreport option is probably a good idea too.
>>> OK, that should be easy to add.
>>>> Just be sure not to change what it sends to the website. That needs
>>>> to
>>>> stay the same.
>>> Sure. I think wrapping an if statement around the HTTP send should  
>>> be
>>> easy; the code of NewNightlyTester.pl isn't very complicated.
>> Cool.
> Actually it's trivial. There was an undocumented $TESTING variable  
> that
> already did exactly what -noreport was supposed to do.
> Patch is attached. Option is now named -nosubmit, in line with
> -submit-server and -submit-script.

Patch applied. Thanks!!!!


>> P.S. I'm not sure if someone has gotten a chance to look at your
>> dejagnu bugs you filed,
> No, the bugs have remained undisturbed. (Except that maybe somebody
> changed the priority.)
>> but if not.. I'll try to take a look this
>> weekend. Unfortunately, I've been preoccupied this week with family
>> matters.
> I have to admit that I was beginning to wonder how fast bug reports  
> and
> fixes would get recognized, but I kept reminding myself that all sorts
> of things can interfere (seems I guessed right with that).
> Oh, and take your time. Some things are more important than others :-)
> Regards,
> Jo
> < 
> NewNightlyTest 
> .pl.nosubmit.patch>_______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list