[LLVMdev] hard values in SequentialType::indexValid () method
clattner at apple.com
Tue Aug 19 17:36:04 PDT 2008
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote:
>> Two options: 1) change LLVM IR to allow it, or 2) just insert sign/
>> zero extension instructions.
>> Does this actually affect the code being generated in practice?
> Inserting sign/zero extension instructions actually do tend to
> the generated code pretty dramatically on our target. So I prefer
I realize that sign extensions have non-zero impact when they exist in
the .s file. My assertion is that these will be zapped by the dag
combiner. Have you actually tried this?
> On x86; but the sign extension does not get eliminated while lowering
> the GEP.
That is because X86 has a 32-bit pointer. If you have a 16-bit
pointer, a sign extend from 16 bits to 16 bits will get deleted.
More information about the llvm-dev