[LLVMdev] Representing the dependencies of a bitcode module

[Chris Lattner]

On Apr 28, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Talin wrote:
> However, I notice that getting access to the strings from within the
> command-line tool is a little complicated, since I have to decompose  
> the
> various constant getElementPtr expressions in order to get at the  
> actual
> string. I'm wondering if there's a better way to represent this
> information. Maybe using the debug API, or perhaps annotation  
> intrinsics?

There isn't a good interface to the annotation intrinsics yet, it  
would be nice to have them, then this could be encoded as annotations.

-Chris