[LLVMdev] Is there a reason why memcmp isn't an intrinsic?

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Sun Apr 13 12:43:15 PDT 2008


On Apr 13, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Talin wrote:

> Since you have memcpy, memmove, and memset in there, I was wondering  
> why
> memcmp wasn't there as well. It seems obvious - which makes me think
> that if it's not there, then there must be some reason for it.

Why do you want it to be an intrinsic?  What does that provide?

-Chris



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list