[LLVMdev] Is there a reason why memcmp isn't an intrinsic?

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Sun Apr 13 12:43:15 PDT 2008

On Apr 13, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Talin wrote:

> Since you have memcpy, memmove, and memset in there, I was wondering  
> why
> memcmp wasn't there as well. It seems obvious - which makes me think
> that if it's not there, then there must be some reason for it.

Why do you want it to be an intrinsic?  What does that provide?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list