[LLVMdev] LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder

Duncan Sands baldrick at free.fr
Thu Apr 3 00:20:12 PDT 2008


> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder and 
> rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, I'd 
> argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old non-folding 
> functionality for debugging purposes.

this plan sounds good to me.  However it's not clear to me how useful a
debug flag would really be.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list