[LLVMdev] LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder
baldrick at free.fr
Thu Apr 3 00:20:12 PDT 2008
> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder and
> rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, I'd
> argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old non-folding
> functionality for debugging purposes.
this plan sounds good to me. However it's not clear to me how useful a
debug flag would really be.
More information about the llvm-dev