[LLVMdev] Function Parameter Requirements?

Duncan Sands baldrick at free.fr
Tue Apr 1 04:14:22 PDT 2008


> - value type

this seems to mean first-class or opaque.  I think it would
be best to change the assertion message to:
  Function arguments must be first-class types or opaque!
This message is used in several places, so all should be changed.

> - scalar type

I think this is the same as first-class.

> - aggregate type

I think this is the same as a sized-type that is not first-class.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list