[LLVMdev] Function Parameter Requirements?
baldrick at free.fr
Tue Apr 1 04:14:22 PDT 2008
> - value type
this seems to mean first-class or opaque. I think it would
be best to change the assertion message to:
Function arguments must be first-class types or opaque!
This message is used in several places, so all should be changed.
> - scalar type
I think this is the same as first-class.
> - aggregate type
I think this is the same as a sized-type that is not first-class.
More information about the llvm-dev