[LLVMdev] Dynamic (JIT) type resolution
nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr
Tue Nov 6 12:17:00 PST 2007
Chris Lattner wrote:
> I don't see how it's the same issue. Once you jit it, it is just machine
> code. Updating the machine code with better code seems like a reasonable
> and obvious optimization.
That's what I want to do! ;-) However, from what I understand, your
solution is to recompile the method. And I don't want to do that. I only
want to dynamically patch the field operation in the native code.
More information about the llvm-dev