[LLVMdev] Dynamic (JIT) type resolution

Nicolas Geoffray nicolas.geoffray at lip6.fr
Tue Nov 6 12:17:00 PST 2007

Chris Lattner wrote:
> I don't see how it's the same issue.  Once you jit it, it is just machine 
> code.  Updating the machine code with better code seems like a reasonable 
> and obvious optimization.

That's what I want to do! ;-) However, from what I understand, your
solution is to recompile the method. And I don't want to do that. I only
want to dynamically patch the field operation in the native code.

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list