[LLVMdev] alloca & store generation

[Ryan M. Lefever]

Thanks for the help.  I apparently missed the part in the documentation 
about %"num" names.

Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Ryan.
> 
>> It seems as though, when the bytecode is disassebled, the result of the 
>> allocas should be given as a parameter to the stores.
> It's given.
> 
>>  If the disassembler doesn't give the allocas a name, then that dependency is 
>> not conveyed.
> Both disassembly & bytecode is correct. Please carefully read LLVM
> Language reference about %"num" names.
> 

-- 
Ryan M. Lefever  [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever]