[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"

[Chris Lattner]

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Gabor Greif wrote:
> Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.

Nice, thanks Gabor!

> My residual doubts center around the question
> whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
> in 2.0/2.1.
> I need a definitive word on this to proceed.

There is now no longer a distinction between compressed and uncompressed 
bitcode.  We just have bitcode, which has one format.

> My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are still 
> some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code (instead of 
> *bit*code). I did not touch those areas, so the attached patch is for 
> review about the IMO undisputed changes.

Ok.  These sorts of changes are also good to do.

> If anybody feels the urge to review the attached patch, feel free
> and concentrate on Path.h/cpp and friends.
>
> I plan to commit this late today or tomorrow (given that all the tests 
> pass).

This looks good to me!

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/