[LLVMdev] Linux/ppc backend
sabre at nondot.org
Sun Feb 4 11:28:20 PST 2007
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote:
>> 2. The X86 backend has the unfortunate habit of saying "if !darwin" "if
>> !cygwin" etc. Most of the changes you've made are actually ABI related
>> changes, not OS-specific changes. As such, I'd prefer it if you added
>> two methods to PPCSubtarget: isMachoABI() and isELF_ABI() (or whatever
>> is the right name of the ABI that linux uses) and use those instead.
> Well all of the changes are ABI related. In fact, could you give me an
> example of what is os-specific and not abi-specific? I'm not sure.
Most of the things you are doing are ABI-related, and until we have
multiple targets using the same ABI, it doesn't make sense to have
An example of an OS-specific aspect: cygwin and mingw on x86 use the same
ABI, however, mingw refers to longjmp as "longjmp" and cygwin refers to it
>>> 3) R31, which replaces R1 as stack pointer when there is a dynamic allocation
>>> in a method, must be seen as a callee-saved register and must not be saved
>>> and restored like it is actually for Darwin. I don't know how to specify
>>> that, when there is a dynamic allocation, R31 must be added to the set of
>>> registers that are saved before entering the method and restored at the end.
>> Can you just mark it callee saved? If so, and if there is an instruction
>> in the function that clobbers R31, it should automatically be saved and
> It is marked callee saved. Because when it is not needed as frame
> pointer it is used like an ordinary register. But when it is used as
> frame pointer, the prologue and epilogue change its value, but the
> algorithm in llvm that finds clobbered register does not select it.
Okay, I'm not sure. If you describe the constraints better, perhaps Jim
or Evan will have an idea :)
More information about the llvm-dev