[LLVMdev] SVN (?) Migration

Andrew Lenharth andrewl at lenharth.org
Sun Apr 29 10:59:40 PDT 2007

On 4/29/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
> David,
> > So I want to pose the question.  Should we consider git instead
> > of SVN?
> The main reason against git is very poor support of windows. Have you
> tried mercurial in comparison with git?

Once the SVN migration is done, the patch structure should make it
much easier to maintain synchronized repositories in other systems
than it is now.  I've been doing that with CVS <-> monotone for a


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list