[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
Tanya M. Lattner
tonic at nondot.org
Fri Nov 17 09:58:10 PST 2006
Thanks Reid. These failures are identical to the ones I got on x86, so
thats good. None of them are regressions.
If you would like to provide an x86 binary for your linux distor, I would
be happy to add it to the website.
Thanks again,
-Tanya
> Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are:
>
> 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler
> 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used)
>
> BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3
> * No issues, just the usual warnings.
>
> BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3
> * No issues
>
> RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3
> * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are
> explainable:
>
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.isamax
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/divides
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl
> * The above tests fail due to either lack of SSE3 hardware on my
> machine or
> lack of support for vector types in my compiler.
>
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
> * The above test fail because llvm-gcc4 doesn't support C++ EH
>
> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
> * Not sure, difference in binary output.
>
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod
> * Weird JIT problem, there's a PR filed on this.
>
> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
> * Not sure, difference in numerical output
>
> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi
> * Note sure.
>
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie
> * Note sure, CBE failed to link:
> /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function `keepWaitingDirsend':
> archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x715): undefined reference to `ltmp_1856_85'
> archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x735): undefined reference to `ltmp_1857_86'
> /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function `retryDirsend':
> archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x8af): undefined reference to `ltmp_1856_85'
> archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x8cf): undefined reference to `ltmp_1857_86'
> /tmp/cc5Bwjx8.o: In function `archie_query':
> archie.cbe.c:(.text+0x1248): undefined reference to `ltmp_1141_82'
>
> Reid.
>
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 11:20 -0800, Reid Spencer wrote:
>> Tanya,
>>
>> Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5)
>>
>> HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS
>> * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't
>> that be llvm-1.9?
>> * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases
>> * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4
>> binary
>> seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs.
>> * I'm going to re-try without using the binaries and building
>> everything from scratch.
>>
>>
>> BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.1.1 20060525 (FAIL)
>> * DwarfWriter.cpp:2400: warning: overflow in implicit constant
>> conversion
>> Line looks like: EmitInt32(DW_CIE_ID); EOL("CIE Identifier
>> Tag");
>> I don't know the code well enough to make a suggestion.
>>
>> The run of llvm-test failed about 50%, some didn't even compile. I
>> didn't bother
>> running the whole thing as it was clear that GCC 4.1.1 (still)
>> mis-compiles LLVM.
>>
>> BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 3.4.6 WITH LLVM-GCC3 CONFIGURED (PASS)
>> * PASS: make, except these innocuous warnings from GCC 3.4.6 linker
>> (known 3.4.6 bug)
>> /proj/install/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN4llvm11SCEVVisitorINS_12SCEVExpanderEPNS_5ValueEE5visitEPNS_4SCEVE' referenced in section `.rodata' of /proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/Release/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a(ScalarEvolutionExpander.o): defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN4llvm11SCEVVisitorINS_12SCEVExpanderEPNS_5ValueEE5visitEPNS_4SCEVE' of /proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/Release/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a(ScalarEvolutionExpander.o)
>>
>> * PASS: make install, except these doc linkage errors:
>> /usr/bin/pod2html: llvm-nm.pod: cannot resolve L<ar(1)> in
>> paragraph 51.
>> /usr/bin/pod2html: llvm-nm.pod: cannot resolve L<nm(1)> in
>> paragraph 51.
>> /usr/bin/pod2html: llvm-ar.pod: cannot resolve L<ar(1)> in
>> paragraph 114.
>>
>> * PASS: make check, except:
>>
>> XPASS: /proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2006-07-31-PR854.c
>> # of expected passes 1542
>> # of unexpected successes 1
>> # of expected failures 41
>>
>> LLVM-TEST NIGHTLY WITH LLVM-GCC3 (FAIL)
>> * The following tests fail:
>> TEST-FAIL: compile /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-InitializedBitField
>> TEST-FAIL: compile /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/nestedloop
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv2/deriv2
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/employ/employ
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office
>> TEST-FAIL: llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes
>> TEST-FAIL: jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes
>> TEST-FAIL: cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes
>>
>> BUILD LLVM WITH LLVM-GCC4 CONFIGURED (PASS/FAIL)
>> * Configure failed to find llvm-gcc4 when the directory provided to
>> --with-llvmgccdir
>> was the llvm-gcc4-1.9-x86-linux directory unpacked from the tarball.
>> The 5-line
>> warning message at the end of configure run was produced. I don't
>> know what configure
>> is looking for, but its not finding it.
>> * FAIL: 'make' failed in runtime library. Althought the runtime
>> library isn't needed
>> with llvm-gcc4, it shouldn't fail to compile it:
>> make[3]: Entering directory
>> `/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend'
>> llvm[3]: Compiling crtend.c for Release build (bytecode)
>> crtend.c:16: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions.
>> * PASS: 'make tools-only'
>>
>> RUN LLVM-TEST WITH LLVM-GCC4 (FAIL)
>> * Most of the test (90%) fail compile with seg fault.
>>
>> PATH="/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/Release/bin:/proj/install/bin:/usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/reid/bin:/opt/j2sdk_1.4.2/j2sdk1.4.2/bin:/opt/oracle/bin" /proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm-gcc4-1.9-x86-linux/bin/llvm-gcc -I/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE -I/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE -I/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/include -I/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm-test/include -I../../../../include -I/proj/llvm/rel1.9/llvm/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__NO_MATH_INLINES -O2 -msse2 -msse2 -O0 -S sse.expandfft.c -o Output/sse.expandfft.ll -emit-llvm
>> sse.expandfft.c:268: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>> Please submit a full bug report,
>> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions.
>> make[5]: [Output/sse.expandfft.ll] Error 1 (ignored)
>> cp -f Output/sse.expandfft.ll Output/sse.expandfft.linked.rll
>> cp: cannot stat `Output/sse.expandfft.ll': No such file or directory
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:49 -0800, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>>> LLVMers,
>>>
>>> The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing:
>>> http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/
>>>
>>> If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs
>>> for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd
>>> also appreciate any documentation reviews.
>>>
>>> Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You
>>> should see one XPASS for Regression/CFrontend/2006-07-31-PR854.c. If you
>>> are getting different failures or unexpected passes, please let me know.
>>> All other platforms should be clean.
>>>
>>> If you find any problems, please email the list. I would appreciate this
>>> testing and documentation review to be completed by Friday, November 17th
>>> at 5:00PM PST.
>>>
>>> If you plan to contribute llvm-gcc4 binaries for another platform, please
>>> complete them by the deadline above as well or send me an email with your
>>> status.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tanya Lattner
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list