[LLVMdev] 1.9 Next Steps

[Reid Spencer]

Hi Tanya,

I've been checking the state of the various llvm-test failures on
X86/Linux with GCC 3.4.6 and llvm-gcc4. I haven't finished this, but I
thought the following might be useful for other people that are testing
the release on Linux.  Each group of failing tests below is followed by
a comment about why its failing.

llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
jit /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
cbe /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc
  ^^ no idea what's causing these

jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod
  ^^ weird jit codegen problem produces wrong FP output, PR963

llc /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
jit /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
cbe /MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod
  ^^ no idea

jit /MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi
  ^^ no idea

cbe /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie
  ^^ cbe doesn't support inline asm (bzero lowering)

jit /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots
llc /MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/allroots/allroots
  ^^ no idea

llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build2
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/build
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/divides
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray
llc /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl
jit /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl
cbe /SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/sumarray-dbl
  ^^ all of the above fail because my 3.4.6 compiler doesn't support
vectors well

llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/exception_spec_test
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/function_try_block
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_rethrow
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/simple_throw
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
jit /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/throw_rethrow_test
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
llc /SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
cbe /SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
  ^^ All of these fail due to C++ exception handling not implemented in
llvm-gcc4

llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench
jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench
  ^^ PR990

llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/except
llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib
  ^^ C++ EH again

llc /SingleSource/CustomChecked/oopack_v1p8
cbe /SingleSource/CustomChecked/oopack_v1p8
  ^^ Not sure, but I suspect its lack of vector support again.

On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 22:39 -0800, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> I created the 1.9 release branch last night. As a reminder, please do not 
> check in any code changes to the release branch. Please send me email if 
> you have changes that need to be merged into the release branch.
> 
> To check out the release branch:
> cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm
> cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-test
> cvs -d <CVS Repository> co -r release_19 llvm-gcc
> svn co svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/tags/release-1.9 dst-directory
> 
> Unlike code changes, please go ahead and commit any documentation changes
> to the release branch (and also mainline) directly without review. I am
> hoping that all LLVMers could spare a few minutes to check over the
> documents to make sure they are up to date. Please complete the 
> documentation review by November 17th at 5PM PST.
> 
> I will be creating tarballs and binaries which will be available for
> testing by November 13th.
> 
> Thanks again for all your hard work!
> 
> -Tanya
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev