[LLVMdev] Indirect function call

Nai Xia nelson.xia at gmail.com
Mon May 22 23:49:13 PDT 2006

I think I will make a try. :)

On Tuesday 23 May 2006 14:03, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Nai Xia wrote:
> > So I am currently thinking that maybe it is not hard to make the 
> > callgraph more accurate in a similar way DSA deals with indirect 
> > callsites. I am just curious about why it is not already in LLVM. I 
> > think identifying the range of an indirect call is a worthwhile job, for 
> > example if we want to track the correctness of a program's control flow 
> > with the possibility that it is being attacked through buffer overflow.
> Sure.  More precise call graph analysis can benefit many clients.  This is 
> why the CallGraph interface is an abstract one that can be implemented 
> with many different algorithms.  If you'd like to work on a new 
> implementation, that would be great.
> -Chris


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list