[LLVMdev] Conflicting passes?
sabre at nondot.org
Tue May 2 22:40:14 PDT 2006
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Domagoj D wrote:
> I thought so. However, it's not clear to me why "preservation" is required at all?
> That's just an optimization. The PassManager should be able to run passes with
> interdependencies by serializing them (for example in the order as they were
> added to the queue).
> This way, users simply have no other choice but to write batch scripts, unless
> if I'm missing something.
More information about the llvm-dev