[LLVMdev] Re: why c++?

[l l]

2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, l l wrote:
> > 2006/8/17, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>:
> >>  LLVM is written primarily in C++, for a variety of reasons,
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please give me one reason,
>
> ok, I like BCPL comments.

Thanks for anwsering for my question, i see.

>
> > Btw, emacs is fine with lisp, c and eclipse is fine with Java.
> > That was interesting fact to me.
>
> Please stop, this is totally off-topic for this list.

I stopped already.

TIA