[LLVMdev] Demo Script Paths

Tanya M. Lattner tonic at nondot.org
Thu Aug 10 10:40:44 PDT 2006


> The demo script isn't part of the release and its not failing.
>
> Do you want me to revert the changes?

No. I just said that we should avoid anymore changes for the next 2 
weeks to maintain stability.

-Tanya

>
> Reid.
>
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:08 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>>> It's already messed with, but there's no harm. If someone turns on the
>>> llvm2cpp option, then they get an error message at the bottom of the
>>> output page. All other output is normal. So, there's no harm in it.
>>> If/when llvm2cpp becomes available on Zion, people then the llvm2cpp
>>> output will appear.  Note that llvm2cpp is a 1.8 release feature. My
>>> change was to help people learning LLVM understand how to construct the
>>> IR in C++. The demo facility is a good tool for that and allows me to
>>> direct people there so they can see how it works.
>>
>> llvm2cpp may be a 1.8 release feature, but this is something that should
>> have been added to the demo script before the release. I don't like the
>> idea of jepordizing the stability of the script during this critical
>> time. Critical meaning.. people will be trying out llvm and if the demo
>> script fails for them.. they may likely give up and not bother with LLVM.
>>
>> I don't disagree with the change. I just think the timing could be better.
>>
>> -Tanya
>>>
>>> Reid.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 09:31 -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to get the demo script to run llvm2cpp so that people can get
>>>>> familiar with the LLVM C++ API through the online demo.  However, it
>>>>> seems that the path used doesn't include llvm2cpp (not updated in a
>>>>> while?).  The demo script currently uses these paths on Zion:
>>>>
>>>> I can look into this, but I would strongly suggest not messing with the
>>>> demo script until 2-3 weeks after this latest release.
>>>>
>>>> -Tanya
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /home/vadve/criswell/box/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/
>>>>> /home/vadve/gaeke/llvm/Release/bin
>>>>> /home/vadve/gaeke/bin
>>>>> /home/vadve/gaeke/llvm/projects/Stacker/Release/bin
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure what the state of John's llvm-gcc is, but using a moving
>>>>> target is not a good idea. Also, its likely that Brian's directories
>>>>> haven't been updated in erm .. a year?
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be nice if we had a "tools-only" build of LLVM available on the
>>>>> server that is updated, say, once per week?  I'd set it up myself, but I
>>>>> don't have access.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the very least, can we get some modern tools into
>>>>> gaeke/llvm/Release/bin ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Reid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list