[LLVMdev] Re: JIT and garbage collection
sabre at nondot.org
Sun Aug 6 14:16:02 PDT 2006
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> The JIT doesn't automatically do this. I don't track where function
>> pointers are and autoreclaim. The client must specifically request that
>> specific functions code be deallocated.
> Would it be a huge change for it to do this? Besides issues of whether
> the garbage collector itself contains garbage-collected code, of course.
How would it work? How would the JIT know where you put function
More information about the llvm-dev