[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT

[Alexander Friedman]

On May  9, Chris Lattner wrote:
> To me, the best interface is the most simple: I would suggest just 
> wrapping the llvm classes and methods you need with simple functions, e.g.
> 
> llvm_function_new/llvm_value_set_name/llvm_executionengine_run_function, 
> etc.
> 
> If kept simple, standardized, and generic, I think it would be very useful 
> to people (even if incomplete).  This would allow others to build on it, 
> and we could 'ship' it as a standard llvm library.

Well, it seems that this is actually the next thing on my to-do
list. I'll have something simple in a few days - where/how should I
post stuff to get some criticism?

Also, how are calling conventions/tail calls progressing?

-- 


-Alex