[LLVMdev] To APR Or Not To APR. That is the question.

[Chris Lattner]

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:

> Our use of APR would be limited to the lib/System library. That is, we
> would provide very thin C++ veneers on top of APR's C interface that
> match the current lib/System and lib/Support APIs.

I think that optionally supporting a an APR interface would not be a bad
idea of obscure platforms, but LLVM should not depend on it.  I think that
all of the major platforms should be natively supported by lib/System.

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.org/
http://nondot.org/sabre/