[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver [high-level comments]

Reid Spencer reid at x10sys.com
Tue Aug 3 21:37:07 PDT 2004


On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 14:12, Vikram Adve wrote:
> I just had a chance to read some of follow-up comments on
> Reid'sinitial document.  I agree with Chris's discussion below of what
> isneeded for users to get IPO/lifelong opt'n via LLVM without
> extensivechanges to Makefiles, and about what .o files should
> contain.  This isin perfect agreement with what I just said about how
> users should viewLLVM.

Yes. I agree now too. We settled that one on IRC a few days ago. I was
just bringing a traditional compilation mindset to the table. I'm over
it :)

Reid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040803/51dd9e6a/attachment.sig>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list