[LLVMdev] An LLVM 1.3 Request

[Alkis Evlogimenos]

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 21:58, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote:
> This is completely opposite the way I work. If I had CVS access, I would
> do the whole change in a branch. This would include fixing all
> makefiles, moving all files, creating/fixing configure scripts, and
> running all regressions to make sure it worked. I would then check in
> the branch, merge mainline into it again and re-test. Once I was synched
> with mainline and everything checked out, I'd commit again.  The branch
> would be verified independently by someone else before being merged back
> to mainline.

It makes you wish we were using bitkeeper or arch, doesn't it? :-)

-- 

Alkis