<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:11 AM Wenlei He via Phabricator <<a href="mailto:reviews@reviews.llvm.org">reviews@reviews.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">wenlei added a comment.<br>
<br>
In D112042#3071977 <<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042#3071977" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042#3071977</a>>, @davidxl wrote:<br>
<br>
> Probably not an issue with FSAFDO discriminators?<br>
<br>
I think so. It only affects AutoFDO using duplication factor, which I assume is still in use for google internally?<br></blockquote><div>We are in the process of moving it out. It does not seem to have performance impact on our benchmarks. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
Repository:<br>
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo<br>
<br>
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION<br>
  <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042/new/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042/new/</a><br>
<br>
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.llvm.org/D112042</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>