<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+1">The problem is not the reversal of the expected
order. The problem is that the *expected* order for pointer-like
keys may differ based on how they are hashed.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">The hashing order may be machine/platform/environment
dependent.</font></p>
<p><font size="+1">--Mandeep</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/24/2017 5:17 PM, David Blaikie
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAENS6EvVE23FQd1r-_u=+1Y1ogj0_TwLTxCkJjvq6vohXeXwGA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Doesn't the test only reverse the expected order if
reverse iteration is enabled? So why is this failing on a
forward iteration build?<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:13 PM Mandeep Singh
Grang via Phabricator <<a
href="mailto:reviews@reviews.llvm.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">reviews@reviews.llvm.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">mgrang
created this revision.<br>
<br>
This test causes failures in forward iteration builds. This
is because we have hard-coded<br>
the expected order of iteration of supported containers.<br>
<br>
<br>
Repository:<br>
rL LLVM<br>
<br>
<a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D37128" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://reviews.llvm.org/D37128</a><br>
<br>
Files:<br>
unittests/Support/ReverseIterationTest.cpp<br>
<br>
<br>
Index: unittests/Support/ReverseIterationTest.cpp<br>
===================================================================<br>
--- unittests/Support/ReverseIterationTest.cpp<br>
+++ unittests/Support/ReverseIterationTest.cpp<br>
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@<br>
#include "llvm/Support/ReverseIteration.h"<br>
#include "gtest/gtest.h"<br>
<br>
+#if LLVM_ENABLE_REVERSE_ITERATION<br>
+<br>
using namespace llvm;<br>
<br>
TEST(ReverseIterationTest, DenseMapTest1) {<br>
@@ -109,3 +111,5 @@<br>
for (auto iter = Set.begin(), end = Set.end(); iter !=
end; iter++, ++i)<br>
ASSERT_EQ(*iter, IterPtrs[i]);<br>
}<br>
+<br>
+#endif<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>