<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-commits <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 3 August 2016 at 17:23, Rafael Espíndola <<a href="mailto:rafael.espindola@gmail.com">rafael.espindola@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Terribly sorry, no.<br>
><br>
> Could you please revert.<br>
<br>
</span>Oh, I didn't revert, and it passed on:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://buildmaster.tcwglab.linaro.org/builders/clang-aarch64-ubuntu-lld/builds/117" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://buildmaster.tcwglab.<wbr>linaro.org/builders/clang-<wbr>aarch64-ubuntu-lld/builds/117</a><br>
<br>
I think we need to bundle Clang and LLVM commits to the LLD buildbot<br>
poller, to make sure we don't assume only LLD commits are responsible<br>
for breakages.<br>
<br>
Also, I just tested and LLD bootstraps Clang and passes the test-suite<br>
on AArch64. :)<br>
<br>
That buildbot will eventually be the one making sure we don't regress on that.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Nice!</div><div><br></div><div>-- Sean Silva</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
cheers,<br>
--renato<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>