<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Hi Michael,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I’m going to commit a quick change to the failing test to get the PPC bots unblocked then I’ll take a closer look to see why it’s failing.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Andy<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_____replyseparator"></a><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Michael Kuperstein [mailto:mkuper@google.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, July 07, 2016 4:38 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor@intel.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> llvm-commits <llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [llvm] r274786 - Include SelectionDAGISel in the opt-bisect process<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Andrew, I think this broke the PPC bots. Could you please take a look?<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">  Michael<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Andrew Kaylor via llvm-commits <<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<p class="MsoNormal">Author: akaylor<br>
Date: Thu Jul  7 13:55:02 2016<br>
New Revision: 274786<br>
<br>
URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=274786&view=rev" target="_blank">
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=274786&view=rev</a><br>
Log:<br>
Include SelectionDAGISel in the opt-bisect process<br>
<br>
Differential Revision: <a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/D21143" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D21143</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Added:<br>
    llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll<br>
Modified:<br>
    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp<br>
<br>
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp<br>
URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp?rev=274786&r1=274785&r2=274786&view=diff" target="_blank">
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp?rev=274786&r1=274785&r2=274786&view=diff</a><br>
==============================================================================<br>
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp (original)<br>
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp Thu Jul  7 13:55:02 2016<br>
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ bool SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunct<br>
   TM.resetTargetOptions(Fn);<br>
   // Reset OptLevel to None for optnone functions.<br>
   CodeGenOpt::Level NewOptLevel = OptLevel;<br>
-  if (Fn.hasFnAttribute(Attribute::OptimizeNone))<br>
+  if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None && skipFunction(Fn))<br>
     NewOptLevel = CodeGenOpt::None;<br>
   OptLevelChanger OLC(*this, NewOptLevel);<br>
<br>
<br>
Added: llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll<br>
URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll?rev=274786&view=auto" target="_blank">
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll?rev=274786&view=auto</a><br>
==============================================================================<br>
--- llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll (added)<br>
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Other/X86/opt-bisect-isel.ll Thu Jul  7 13:55:02 2016<br>
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@<br>
+; This test verifies that no optimizations are performed on the @f function<br>
+; when the -opt-bisect-limit=0 option is used.  In particular, the X86<br>
+; instruction selector will optimize the cmp instruction to a sub instruction<br>
+; if it is not run in -O0 mode.<br>
+<br>
+; RUN: llc -O3 -opt-bisect-limit=0 -o - %s | FileCheck %s<br>
+<br>
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"<br>
+<br>
+define void @f() {<br>
+entry:<br>
+  %cmp = icmp slt i32 undef, 8<br>
+  br i1 %cmp, label %middle, label %end<br>
+<br>
+middle:<br>
+  br label %end<br>
+<br>
+end:<br>
+  ret void<br>
+}<br>
+<br>
+; CHECK: cmpl $8, %eax<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>