Hi,<br><br>I hadn't even considered that. Yep, that's probably an easier way to go!<br><br>James<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 at 17:54, Chris Matthews via llvm-commits <<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">cmatthews added a comment.<br>
<br>
Question: would it be simpler to just to make a new runtest module?  nt.py IS just really a makefile wrapper.  No point in supporting the same options if that adds complexity.<br>
<br>
<br>
Repository:<br>
  rL LLVM<br>
<br>
<a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/D14541" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D14541</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</blockquote></div>