<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:34 PM, <a href="mailto:hfinkel@anl.gov">hfinkel@anl.gov</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hfinkel@anl.gov" target="_blank">hfinkel@anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">hfinkel added inline comments.<br>
<br>
================<br>
<span class="">Comment at: ELF/OutputSections.h:290-291<br>
@@ -289,2 +289,4 @@<br>
   static OutputSection<ELFT> *Bss;<br>
+  static OutputSection<ELFT> *Opd;<br>
+  static uint8_t *OpdBuf;<br>
   static PltSection<ELFT> *Plt;<br>
----------------<br>
</span><span class="">ruiu wrote:<br>
> Alright, I found that not look very good. How about adding these two fields to PPC64TargetInfo?<br>
</span>I'll try that.<br>
<br>
FYI: PPC64, Itanium and HPPA seem to use the .opd section. Thus, while theoretically generic, I suspect we can consider this to be PPC64-specific in practice. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed.</div></div></div></div>