<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-commits <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org" target="_blank">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">aprantl added a comment.<br>
<br>
I assume that a function without code will never get inlined, so this should not cause a problem with inlining.<br>
David, could this affect overload resolution if it is a C++ method that is being eliminated?<br>
<span class=""><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I thought we did inline empty functions? I know that in analyzeCall we give the go ahead if the function is empty.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
<br>
Repository:<br>
  rL LLVM<br>
<br>
<a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/D12426" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D12426</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org">llvm-commits@lists.llvm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>