<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/24/2015 05:08 PM, Daniel Berlin
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAF4BwTVadL-MfYHD1TkhPLvgwVLpbAh_h+zKsprXb3XEgPKoVA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:07 PM,
Daniel Berlin <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:dberlin@dberlin.org" target="_blank">dberlin@dberlin.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>But i'm happy to do either :)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I could also rewrite MergedLoadStoreMotion to
use it. It would simplify the code pretty greatly,
i think, since it would no longer have to look
at/walk successor blocks</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Sorry, i mean: This could actually be done, right now,
in it's current state without any additional laziness.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
This would be a pretty nice result. Simplify MLSM substantially and
possibly making it more effective would be a definite win. <br>
<br>
Philip<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>