<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div></div><div><br><div><div>On May 2, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@google.com">chandlerc@google.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ghoflehner@apple.com" target="_blank">ghoflehner@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I can see the arguments pro independent pass, but why do you assert it will make the code much easier to review? The code is coherent as it is and won’t change whether it is part of GVN or its own phase. </blockquote>
</div><br>Because then I don't have to even think about GVN? Anyways, it should be *much* easier to test.</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>