Hi Daniel,<div><br></div><div>Sorry for committing without a LGTM.  I thought it was OK to commit since there was no further discussion.  Sorry about this.</div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,<span></span></div><div>Logan<br>

<br>On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Logan Chien <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tzuhsiang.chien@gmail.com');" target="_blank">tzuhsiang.chien@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Hi Joerg,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for your review.<span></span></div><div><br></div>Logan<span></span><br><div><div><br>On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Joerg Sonnenberger <<a>joerg@britannica.bec.de</a>> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:10:03AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote:<br>
> Hi Logan,<br>
><br>
> I know that you addressed Joerg's comments at <a href="http://reviews.llvm.org/D3828" target="_blank">http://reviews.llvm.org/D3828</a> but I didn't see an LGTM (or words to that effect) for this patch so I think it was still being reviewed when you committed it.<br>




><br>
> Joerg: Were you happy with the updated patch?<br>
<br>
Yes.<br>
<br>
Joerg<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a>llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>