<div dir="ltr">Ahh, I see why... the --enable-libcpp thing doesn't work at all the way autoconf tests usually work, in part because it is relying on the very strange LLVM makefile arrangement...<div><br></div><div>I'll try a totally different approach, give me a bit.</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Chandler Carruth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chandlerc@gmail.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">That configure log doesn't appear to have my change... investigating further...</div><div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dexonsmith@apple.com" target="_blank">dexonsmith@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Chandler,<br>
<br>
I finally found the spot to update zorg and reconfigured it. I reran r199325 with --enable-libcpp here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental/builds/11180" target="_blank">http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental/builds/11180</a><br>
<br>
Here’s a link to the call to configure:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental/builds/11180/steps/configure.with.host/logs/stdio" target="_blank">http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental/builds/11180/steps/configure.with.host/logs/stdio</a><br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
Duncan<br>
</font></span><div><div><br>
On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Bob Wilson <<a href="mailto:bob.wilson@apple.com" target="_blank">bob.wilson@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Nope. Still not working.<br>
><br>
> Duncan is going to change the <a href="http://lab.llvm.org" target="_blank">lab.llvm.org</a> bot to use —enable-libcpp so you can see the status for yourself.<br>
> <a href="http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental" target="_blank">http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-nobootstrap-RAincremental</a><br>
><br>
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@gmail.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hopefully r199325 fixes this. It's not really pretty, but I wanted to get you something before spending more time looking for the "right" place to do this test.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Bob Wilson <<a href="mailto:bob.wilson@apple.com" target="_blank">bob.wilson@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@gmail.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Bob Wilson <<a href="mailto:bob.wilson@apple.com" target="_blank">bob.wilson@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> Our buildbots have an old version of libstdc++ that has that problem. But, we run configure with -stdlib=libc++, so it doesn’t matter what version of libstdc++ is on the machine.<br>
>>><br>
>>> The configure check is not honoring —enable-libcpp, so it’s checking the wrong library.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Ahh, I see, it's because the enabling of libc++ happens too late. I had expected that when the host was clang on darwin it would *default* to libc++, sorry for that.<br>
>><br>
>> It does default to libc++ on Mavericks but most of our buildbots are still running Mountain Lion.<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Lemme try re-shuffling these tests to better cope with that.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks!<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:17 AM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@gmail.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bob Wilson <<a href="mailto:bob.wilson@apple.com" target="_blank">bob.wilson@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>> We shouldn’t be checking this when configure is run with —enable-libcpp. This is breaking all of our buildbots.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Why?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Notably, is there some version of libc++ which *also* has the bug that libstdc++ has?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:31 AM, Chandler Carruth <<a href="mailto:chandlerc@gmail.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> > Author: chandlerc<br>
>>>> > Date: Wed Jan 15 04:31:15 2014<br>
>>>> > New Revision: 199313<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=199313&view=rev" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=199313&view=rev</a><br>
>>>> > Log:<br>
>>>> > Add a check to configure that the libstdc++ selected by Clang isn't<br>
>>>> > libstdc++v4.6. This is quite hard to test directly, so we test for it by<br>
>>>> > checking a known missing feature in that version that was added in v4.7.<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > This should prevent users from upgrading Clang but not GCC and hosting<br>
>>>> > with a too-old GCC's libstdc++ and getting strange and hard to debug<br>
>>>> > errors when we switch to C++11 by default.<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > Also, switch several of the macros I introduced to use AC_LANG_SOURCE<br>
>>>> > rather than AC_LANG_PROGRAM as we don't need configure's help writing<br>
>>>> > our main function (and we don't need such a function at all for most of<br>
>>>> > the tests).<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > Modified:<br>
>>>> > llvm/trunk/autoconf/<a href="http://configure.ac" target="_blank">configure.ac</a><br>
>>>> > llvm/trunk/configure<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > Modified: llvm/trunk/autoconf/<a href="http://configure.ac" target="_blank">configure.ac</a><br>
>>>> > URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/autoconf/configure.ac?rev=199313&r1=199312&r2=199313&view=diff" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/autoconf/configure.ac?rev=199313&r1=199312&r2=199313&view=diff</a><br>
>>>> > ==============================================================================<br>
>>>> > --- llvm/trunk/autoconf/<a href="http://configure.ac" target="_blank">configure.ac</a> (original)<br>
>>>> > +++ llvm/trunk/autoconf/<a href="http://configure.ac" target="_blank">configure.ac</a> Wed Jan 15 04:31:15 2014<br>
>>>> > @@ -102,15 +102,15 @@ dnl other possible compilers.<br>
>>>> > AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether GCC or Clang is our host compiler])<br>
>>>> > AC_LANG_PUSH([C++])<br>
>>>> > llvm_cv_cxx_compiler=unknown<br>
>>>> > -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#if ! __clang__<br>
>>>> > - #error<br>
>>>> > - #endif<br>
>>>> > - ]])],<br>
>>>> > +AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[#if ! __clang__<br>
>>>> > + #error<br>
>>>> > + #endif<br>
>>>> > + ]])],<br>
>>>> > llvm_cv_cxx_compiler=clang,<br>
>>>> > - [AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#if ! __GNUC__<br>
>>>> > - #error<br>
>>>> > - #endif<br>
>>>> > - ]])],<br>
>>>> > + [AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[#if ! __GNUC__<br>
>>>> > + #error<br>
>>>> > + #endif<br>
>>>> > + ]])],<br>
>>>> > llvm_cv_cxx_compiler=gcc, [])])<br>
>>>> > AC_LANG_POP([C++])<br>
>>>> > AC_MSG_RESULT([${llvm_cv_cxx_compiler}])<br>
>>>> > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ case "$enableval" in<br>
>>>> > case "$llvm_cv_cxx_compiler" in<br>
>>>> > clang)<br>
>>>> > AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether Clang is new enough])<br>
>>>> > - AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[<br>
>>>> > + AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[<br>
>>>> > #if __clang_major__ < 3 || (__clang_major__ == 3 && __clang_minor__ < 1)<br>
>>>> > #error This version of Clang is too old to build LLVM<br>
>>>> > #endif<br>
>>>> > @@ -140,10 +140,34 @@ case "$enableval" in<br>
>>>> > The selected Clang compiler is not new enough to build LLVM. Please upgrade to<br>
>>>> > Clang 3.1. You may pass --disable-compiler-version-checks to configure to<br>
>>>> > bypass these sanity checks.])])<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > + dnl Note that libstdc++4.6 is known broken for C++11 builds. The errors<br>
>>>> > + dnl are sometimes deeply confusing though. Here we test for an obvious<br>
>>>> > + dnl incomplete feature in 4.6's standard library that was completed in<br>
>>>> > + dnl 4.7's.<br>
>>>> > + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether Clang will select a modern C++ standard library])<br>
>>>> > + llvm_cv_old_cxxflags="$CXXFLAGS"<br>
>>>> > + CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -std=c++0x"<br>
>>>> > + AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[<br>
>>>> > +#include <atomic><br>
>>>> > +std::atomic<float> x(0.0f);<br>
>>>> > +int main() { return (float)x; }<br>
>>>> > +]])],<br>
>>>> > + [AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])],<br>
>>>> > + [AC_MSG_RESULT([no])<br>
>>>> > + AC_MSG_ERROR([<br>
>>>> > +We detected a missing feature in the standard C++ library that was known to be<br>
>>>> > +missing in libstdc++4.6 and implemented in libstdc++4.7. There are numerous<br>
>>>> > +C++11 problems with 4.6's library, and we don't support GCCs or libstdc++ older<br>
>>>> > +than 4.7. You will need to update your system and ensure Clang uses the newer<br>
>>>> > +standard library.<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +If this error is incorrect or you need to force things to work, you may pass<br>
>>>> > +'--disable-compiler-version-checks' to configure to bypass this test.])])<br>
>>>> > ;;<br>
>>>> > gcc)<br>
>>>> > AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether GCC is new enough])<br>
>>>> > - AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[<br>
>>>> > + AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[<br>
>>>> > #if __GNUC__ < 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 7)<br>
>>>> > #error This version of GCC is too old to build LLVM<br>
>>>> > #endif<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > Modified: llvm/trunk/configure<br>
>>>> > URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/configure?rev=199313&r1=199312&r2=199313&view=diff" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/configure?rev=199313&r1=199312&r2=199313&view=diff</a><br>
>>>> > ==============================================================================<br>
>>>> > --- llvm/trunk/configure (original)<br>
>>>> > +++ llvm/trunk/configure Wed Jan 15 04:31:15 2014<br>
>>>> > @@ -3593,16 +3593,9 @@ cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext<br>
>>>> > cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > /* end confdefs.h. */<br>
>>>> > #if ! __clang__<br>
>>>> > - #error<br>
>>>> > - #endif<br>
>>>> > + #error<br>
>>>> > + #endif<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > -int<br>
>>>> > -main ()<br>
>>>> > -{<br>
>>>> > -<br>
>>>> > - ;<br>
>>>> > - return 0;<br>
>>>> > -}<br>
>>>> > _ACEOF<br>
>>>> > rm -f conftest.$ac_objext<br>
>>>> > if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"<br>
>>>> > @@ -3650,16 +3643,9 @@ cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext<br>
>>>> > cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > /* end confdefs.h. */<br>
>>>> > #if ! __GNUC__<br>
>>>> > - #error<br>
>>>> > - #endif<br>
>>>> > -<br>
>>>> > -int<br>
>>>> > -main ()<br>
>>>> > -{<br>
>>>> > + #error<br>
>>>> > + #endif<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > - ;<br>
>>>> > - return 0;<br>
>>>> > -}<br>
>>>> > _ACEOF<br>
>>>> > rm -f conftest.$ac_objext<br>
>>>> > if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"<br>
>>>> > @@ -3748,13 +3734,6 @@ cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > #error This version of Clang is too old to build LLVM<br>
>>>> > #endif<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > -int<br>
>>>> > -main ()<br>
>>>> > -{<br>
>>>> > -<br>
>>>> > - ;<br>
>>>> > - return 0;<br>
>>>> > -}<br>
>>>> > _ACEOF<br>
>>>> > rm -f conftest.$ac_objext<br>
>>>> > if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"<br>
>>>> > @@ -3810,6 +3789,88 @@ bypass these sanity checks." >&2;}<br>
>>>> > fi<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether Clang will select a modern C++ standard library" >&5<br>
>>>> > +echo $ECHO_N "checking whether Clang will select a modern C++ standard library... $ECHO_C" >&6; }<br>
>>>> > + llvm_cv_old_cxxflags="$CXXFLAGS"<br>
>>>> > + CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -std=c++0x"<br>
>>>> > + cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > +/* confdefs.h. */<br>
>>>> > +_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext<br>
>>>> > +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > +/* end confdefs.h. */<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +#include <atomic><br>
>>>> > +std::atomic<float> x(0.0f);<br>
>>>> > +int main() { return (float)x; }<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > +rm -f conftest.$ac_objext conftest$ac_exeext<br>
>>>> > +if { (ac_try="$ac_link"<br>
>>>> > +case "(($ac_try" in<br>
>>>> > + *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > + *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > +esac<br>
>>>> > +eval "echo \"\$as_me:$LINENO: $ac_try_echo\"") >&5<br>
>>>> > + (eval "$ac_link") 2>conftest.er1<br>
>>>> > + ac_status=$?<br>
>>>> > + grep -v '^ *+' conftest.er1 >conftest.err<br>
>>>> > + rm -f conftest.er1<br>
>>>> > + cat conftest.err >&5<br>
>>>> > + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5<br>
>>>> > + (exit $ac_status); } &&<br>
>>>> > + { ac_try='test -z "$ac_cxx_werror_flag" || test ! -s conftest.err'<br>
>>>> > + { (case "(($ac_try" in<br>
>>>> > + *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > + *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > +esac<br>
>>>> > +eval "echo \"\$as_me:$LINENO: $ac_try_echo\"") >&5<br>
>>>> > + (eval "$ac_try") 2>&5<br>
>>>> > + ac_status=$?<br>
>>>> > + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5<br>
>>>> > + (exit $ac_status); }; } &&<br>
>>>> > + { ac_try='test -s conftest$ac_exeext'<br>
>>>> > + { (case "(($ac_try" in<br>
>>>> > + *\"* | *\`* | *\\*) ac_try_echo=\$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > + *) ac_try_echo=$ac_try;;<br>
>>>> > +esac<br>
>>>> > +eval "echo \"\$as_me:$LINENO: $ac_try_echo\"") >&5<br>
>>>> > + (eval "$ac_try") 2>&5<br>
>>>> > + ac_status=$?<br>
>>>> > + echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5<br>
>>>> > + (exit $ac_status); }; }; then<br>
>>>> > + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: yes" >&5<br>
>>>> > +echo "${ECHO_T}yes" >&6; }<br>
>>>> > +else<br>
>>>> > + echo "$as_me: failed program was:" >&5<br>
>>>> > +sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > + { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: no" >&5<br>
>>>> > +echo "${ECHO_T}no" >&6; }<br>
>>>> > + { { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error:<br>
>>>> > +We detected a missing feature in the standard C++ library that was known to be<br>
>>>> > +missing in libstdc++4.6 and implemented in libstdc++4.7. There are numerous<br>
>>>> > +C++11 problems with 4.6's library, and we don't support GCCs or libstdc++ older<br>
>>>> > +than 4.7. You will need to update your system and ensure Clang uses the newer<br>
>>>> > +standard library.<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +If this error is incorrect or you need to force things to work, you may pass<br>
>>>> > +'--disable-compiler-version-checks' to configure to bypass this test." >&5<br>
>>>> > +echo "$as_me: error:<br>
>>>> > +We detected a missing feature in the standard C++ library that was known to be<br>
>>>> > +missing in libstdc++4.6 and implemented in libstdc++4.7. There are numerous<br>
>>>> > +C++11 problems with 4.6's library, and we don't support GCCs or libstdc++ older<br>
>>>> > +than 4.7. You will need to update your system and ensure Clang uses the newer<br>
>>>> > +standard library.<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +If this error is incorrect or you need to force things to work, you may pass<br>
>>>> > +'--disable-compiler-version-checks' to configure to bypass this test." >&2;}<br>
>>>> > + { (exit 1); exit 1; }; }<br>
>>>> > +fi<br>
>>>> > +<br>
>>>> > +rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext \<br>
>>>> > + conftest$ac_exeext conftest.$ac_ext<br>
>>>> > ;;<br>
>>>> > gcc)<br>
>>>> > { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether GCC is new enough" >&5<br>
>>>> > @@ -3825,13 +3886,6 @@ cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF<br>
>>>> > #error This version of GCC is too old to build LLVM<br>
>>>> > #endif<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > -int<br>
>>>> > -main ()<br>
>>>> > -{<br>
>>>> > -<br>
>>>> > - ;<br>
>>>> > - return 0;<br>
>>>> > -}<br>
>>>> > _ACEOF<br>
>>>> > rm -f conftest.$ac_objext<br>
>>>> > if { (ac_try="$ac_compile"<br>
>>>> > @@ -10606,7 +10660,7 @@ else<br>
>>>> > lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2<br>
>>>> > lt_status=$lt_dlunknown<br>
>>>> > cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<EOF<br>
>>>> > -#line 10609 "configure"<br>
>>>> > +#line 10663 "configure"<br>
>>>> > #include "confdefs.h"<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > #if HAVE_DLFCN_H<br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> ><br>
>>>> > _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> > llvm-commits mailing list<br>
>>>> > <a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
>>>> > <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> llvm-commits mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> llvm-commits mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>