<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><div>Hi Hal,</div><div><br></div></div><div><blockquote type="cite" dir="auto"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><blockquote type="cite"><br>Regressions:<br>SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/lowercase 15.10%<br>MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt<br>13.18%<br>SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix 8.27%<br>SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench 7.30%<br></blockquote><br>Do we understand anything about these? I'm specifically curious why the Shootout/matrix was helped so much while Shootout-C++/matrix was hurt?<br><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I am not sure. I am now starting the analysis of these benchmarks. </div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Nadav</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br></body></html>