<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Hans Wennborg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hans@chromium.org" target="_blank" class="cremed">hans@chromium.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":7qe" style="overflow:hidden">$ diff --unified /tmp/library.txt /tmp/all.txt | grep -e "^+"<br>
+++ /tmp/all.txt        <span class="aBn" tabindex="0"><span class="aQJ">2013-08-21</span></span> 15:22:31.163831100 -0700<br>
+./bin/clang-tblgen.exe<br>
+./bin/llvm-lit<br>
+./bin/llvm-tblgen.exe<br>
+./share<br>
+./share/llvm<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/AddLLVM.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/AddLLVMDefinitions.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/ChooseMSVCCRT.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/GetSVN.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/HandleLLVMOptions.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/LLVM-Config.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/LLVMConfigVersion.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/LLVMParseArguments.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/LLVMProcessSources.cmake<br>
+./share/llvm/cmake/TableGen.cmake </div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":7qe" style="overflow:hidden">
<br>
Note that FileCheck, count, not, et al. are not installed, and they<br>
never were (my "all" variant is equivalent to our current install<br>
target). I should have noticed that earlier :/<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Interesting!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":7qe" style="overflow:hidden">
<br>
The cmake files are needed if someone builds e.g. Clang out-of-tree<br>
against the LLVM install dir.<br>
<br>
I don't think it makes sense to install llvm-tblgen and clang-tblgen<br>
at all. (Maybe it made sense before, when clang used llvm's tablegen).<br>
<br>
Given the above, would it make sense to merge #1 and #2?</div></blockquote></div><br>Quite possibly... Can we avoid installing llvm-lit as well? (probably ask Jordan?) If so, then SGTM.</div></div>