<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Well, it's definitely not your fault.
      Cause you have followed the official code review process quite
      well (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews">http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-reviews</a>).<br>
      <br>
      On the other hand you have probably targeted a bit to much by
      directly going into the direction of adding the passes to very
      common (e.g. target independent) code. For a start it would have
      probably been better to add the passes to the R600 backend alone
      and let them age a bit there while doing the necessary refactoring
      of the existing SimplifyCFG code.<br>
      <br>
      But anyway the damage is done, and we new have only two options:
      Fix it inplace or rip it out again and fix it then, I'm fine with
      either.<br>
      <br>
      Christian.<br>
      <br>
      Am 29.07.2013 04:52, schrieb Ye, Mei:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:87C5754BF7FCA043BFEC66764261A44C046D2ED1@sausexdag02.amd.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">It
            also depends on review turn-around time.  I have to say that
            the review process is not clearly defined here.  And it is
            the most lengthy review compared to other open sources.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p><br>
            </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">-Mei<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
          1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
              Chandler Carruth [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:chandlerc@google.com">mailto:chandlerc@google.com</a>]
              <br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:26 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> Ye, Mei<br>
              <b>Cc:</b> Andrew Trick; Matt Arsenault; Evan Cheng; llvm
              commits; Koenig, Christian<br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [patch] simplifyCFG for review<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Ye,
                Mei <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:Mei.Ye@amd.com" target="_blank">Mei.Ye@amd.com</a>>
                wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal">I will re-factor the code following
                your suggestion.  If the check-in process can’t be
                finished next week,  please allow some delay since my
                sabbatical is coming.<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
              FWIW, if you can't finish the refactoring in a reasonably
              short period of time, it might be more appropriate to pull
              this out and refactor it locally when you have time, and
              resubmit it.<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Note, I don't have a problem with
              refactoring it in-tree, just don't want you to feel
              pressured to finish it in a short timeframe, and don't
              want others to be confused by the half-refactored state of
              things over a long period of time.<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>