<div dir="ltr">On 29 January 2013 02:56, Kostya Serebryany <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kcc@google.com" target="_blank">kcc@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<br>
  I would drop support for valgrind-based tsan completely.<br>
  When we'll need to test llvm for threading issues again, we'll need to make it tsan2-clean.<br>
  Nick?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Yes, llvm should stay tsan clean, but that should mean tsan2, not the old valgrind tsan. Feel free to yank out the old tsan-valgrind annotations.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  Agree about memcheck.<br>
  How about creating a file e.g. lib/Support/DynamicTools.h and including files from compiler-rt/include there?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<a href="http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D336" target="_blank">http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D336</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
llvm-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu">llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>