<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Jason Kim wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Renato Golin <<a href="mailto:Renato.Golin@arm.com">Renato.Golin@arm.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Renato, do you know where do they come from? Are they just aliases?<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Good question. Never seen them, but surely looks that way.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Will check some internal sources (people that know binutils better) and will come back to you tomorrow.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Hopefully we can just use the "official" ones .<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">If you use CodeSourcery's GCC you should be perfectly fine.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">As far as I know they offer full compatibility with the ARM toolkit, so even though it might not use it internally all the time, it sure understands ARM ABI.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">If it doesn't, it's a bug. ;)<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><br>The names for the enums are internal to LLVM anyways, only the values<br>matter to the outside world. If some other toolchain uses their own<br>flavor for the value names, no harm done - right?<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>It's definitely easiest to go ahead and use the same names if you know what they are :)</div><div><br></div><div>-eric</div></body></html>