<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Aug 30, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Owen Anderson wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>So back to the original point: why should this be in the tree?<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div>In principle, because I thought it was a useful example on the level with our existing ones. If tutorialize-it, I <i>would</i> like to keep a copy in-tree, just like we do for Kaleidoscope, so that we can detect when API changes require an update.</div><div><br></div><div>That said, I'll be happy to host it out-of-tree until such time as the tutorial is written, if you'd prefer.</div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I'd prefer it to be out of three. The bar for examples (and tutorials) should be very high, I don't think anything relating to brainfuck passes that bar. And yes, I strongly support removing the BrainF example.</div><div><br></div><div>-Chris</div><br></body></html>