<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Oct 22, 2008, at 1:15 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dan Gohman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gohman@apple.com">gohman@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Author: djg<br> Date: Tue Oct 21 15:00:42 2008<br> New Revision: 57925<br> <br> URL: <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=57925&view=rev" target="_blank">http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=57925&view=rev</a><br> Log:<br> Fix SelectionDAGBuild lowering of Select instructions to<br> handle first-class aggregate values. Also, fix a bug in<br> the Ret handling for empty aggregates.<br> <br> Added:<br> llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/pr2924.ll<br> Modified:<br> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp<br> <br> </blockquote></div><br>Any chance this will make it into the 2.4 branch ?</blockquote></div><br><div>If you have an example of C code that worked with llvm-gcc in 2.3 but that fails with llvm-gcc in 2.4, then it would be a regression and yes we would want to pull it in. Otherwise unfortunately we shouldn't pull it in.</div><div><br></div><div>-Chris</div></body></html>