[llvm] [InstCombine] Add folds for `(fp_binop ({s|u}itofp x), ({s|u}itofp y))` (PR #82555)

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1401,6 +1401,179 @@ Value *InstCombinerImpl::dyn_castNegVal(Value *V) const {
   return nullptr;
 }
 
+// Try to fold:
+//    1) (fp_binop ({s|u}itofp x), ({s|u}itofp y))
+//        -> ({s|u}itofp (int_binop x, y))
+//    2) (fp_binop ({s|u}itofp x), FpC)
+//        -> ({s|u}itofp (int_binop x, (fpto{s|u}i FpC)))
+Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::foldFBinOpOfIntCasts(BinaryOperator &BO) {
+  Value *IntOps[2] = {nullptr, nullptr};
+  Constant *Op1FpC = nullptr;
+
+  // Check for:
+  //    1) (binop ({s|u}itofp x), ({s|u}itofp y))
+  //    2) (binop ({s|u}itofp x), FpC)
+  if (!match(BO.getOperand(0), m_SIToFP(m_Value(IntOps[0]))) &&
+      !match(BO.getOperand(0), m_UIToFP(m_Value(IntOps[0]))))
+    return nullptr;
+
+  if (!match(BO.getOperand(1), m_Constant(Op1FpC)) &&
+      !match(BO.getOperand(1), m_SIToFP(m_Value(IntOps[1]))) &&
+      !match(BO.getOperand(1), m_UIToFP(m_Value(IntOps[1]))))
+    return nullptr;
+
+  Type *FPTy = BO.getType();
+  Type *IntTy = IntOps[0]->getType();
+
+  // Do we have signed casts?
+  bool OpsFromSigned = isa<SIToFPInst>(BO.getOperand(0));
+
+  unsigned IntSz = IntTy->getScalarSizeInBits();
+  // This is the maximum number of inuse bits by the integer where the int -> fp
+  // casts are exact.
+  unsigned MaxRepresentableBits =
+      APFloat::semanticsPrecision(FPTy->getScalarType()->getFltSemantics());
+
+  // Cache KnownBits a bit to potentially save some analysis.
+  WithCache<const Value *> OpsKnown[2] = {IntOps[0], IntOps[1]};
+
+  // Preserve known number of leading bits. This can allow us to trivial nsw/nuw
+  // checks later on.
+  unsigned NumUsedLeadingBits[2] = {IntSz, IntSz};
+
+  auto IsNonZero = [&](unsigned OpNo) -> bool {
+    if (OpsKnown[OpNo].hasKnownBits() &&
+        OpsKnown[OpNo].getKnownBits(SQ).isNonZero())
+      return true;
+    return isKnownNonZero(IntOps[OpNo], SQ.DL);
+  };
+
+  auto IsNonNeg = [&](unsigned OpNo) -> bool {
+    if (OpsKnown[OpNo].hasKnownBits() &&
+        OpsKnown[OpNo].getKnownBits(SQ).isNonNegative())
+      return true;
+    return isKnownNonNegative(IntOps[OpNo], SQ);
+  };
+
+  // Check if we know for certain that ({s|u}itofp op) is exact.
+  auto IsValidPromotion = [&](unsigned OpNo) -> bool {
+    // If fp precision >= bitwidth(op) then its exact.
+    // NB: This is slightly conservative for `sitofp`. For signed conversion, we
+    // can handle `MaxRepresentableBits == IntSz - 1` as the sign bit will be
+    // handled specially. We can't, however, increase the bound arbitrarily for
+    // `sitofp` as for larger sizes, it won't sign extend.
+    if (MaxRepresentableBits >= IntSz)
+      ;
----------------
arsenm wrote:

Empty statement weird here; invert conditions? 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82555