[llvm] [InstCombine] Don't require GEP in indexed compare fold (PR #81614)

Nikita Popov via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 13 12:12:09 PST 2024


nikic wrote:

> You would expect the same logic to apply to the rest of stage2 CTMark no?

I don't really follow. The stage2 CTMark results use the stage2 compiler and are affected by optimization improvements that affect the stage2 compiler. If there are substantial differences between stage1 and stage2 CTMark results, that's usually the cause.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81614


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list