[llvm] Remove m_OneUse check only for max, not min (PR #81505)

[via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/AtariDreams updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81505

>From 2ec2c171f997c7cd9c435ae403e67829986e6257 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+AtariDreams at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 11:25:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Remove m_OneUse check only for max, not min

If it is ever determined that min doesn't need one-use, then we can in fact remove that version entirely.
---
 .../InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp          | 26 ++++++++++++++-----
 llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maximum.ll   |  2 +-
 llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maxnum.ll    |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp
index 56d1259e955196..96048e31e7617f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCalls.cpp
@@ -2265,14 +2265,28 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitCallInst(CallInst &CI) {
 
     // max X, -X --> fabs X
     // min X, -X --> -(fabs X)
-    // TODO: Remove one-use limitation? That is obviously better for max.
-    //       It would be an extra instruction for min (fnabs), but that is
-    //       still likely better for analysis and codegen.
-    if ((match(Arg0, m_OneUse(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)))) && Arg1 == X) ||
-        (match(Arg1, m_OneUse(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)))) && Arg0 == X)) {
+    if ((match(Arg0, m_OneUse(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)))) &&
+         match(Arg1, m_Specific(X))) ||
+        (match(Arg1, m_OneUse(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)))) &&
+         match(Arg0, m_Specific(X)))) {
       Value *R = Builder.CreateUnaryIntrinsic(Intrinsic::fabs, X, II);
-      if (IID == Intrinsic::minimum || IID == Intrinsic::minnum)
+      if (IID == Intrinsic::minimum || IID == Intrinsic::minnum) {
         R = Builder.CreateFNegFMF(R, II);
+      }
+
+      return replaceInstUsesWith(*II, R);
+    }
+
+    // No one-use. Only for max.
+    // TODO: Remove one-use limitation? That is obviously better for max,
+    // hence why we don't check for one-use for that. However,
+    // it would be an extra instruction for min (fnabs), but
+    // that is still likely better for analysis and codegen. If so, delete
+    // one-use version
+    if ((((match(Arg0, m_FNeg(m_Value(X)))) && match(Arg1, m_Specific(X))) ||
+         (match(Arg1, m_FNeg(m_Value(X))) && match(Arg0, m_Specific(X)))) &&
+        IID != Intrinsic::minimum && IID != Intrinsic::minnum) {
+      Value *R = Builder.CreateUnaryIntrinsic(Intrinsic::fabs, X, II);
       return replaceInstUsesWith(*II, R);
     }
 
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maximum.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maximum.ll
index 82e4c8794c1c84..88cb2984510002 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maximum.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maximum.ll
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ define float @negated_op_extra_use(float %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @negated_op_extra_use(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[NEGX:%.*]] = fneg float [[X:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use(float [[NEGX]])
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = call float @llvm.maximum.f32(float [[NEGX]], float [[X]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = call float @llvm.fabs.f32(float [[X]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret float [[R]]
 ;
   %negx = fneg float %x
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maxnum.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maxnum.ll
index 87288b18cbcd9f..a1a2b096cb2745 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maxnum.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/maxnum.ll
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ define float @negated_op_extra_use(float %x) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @negated_op_extra_use(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[NEGX:%.*]] = fneg float [[X:%.*]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    call void @use(float [[NEGX]])
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = call float @llvm.maxnum.f32(float [[NEGX]], float [[X]])
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = call float @llvm.fabs.f32(float [[X]])
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret float [[R]]
 ;
   %negx = fneg float %x