[llvm] [clang] [NVPTX] Add 'activemask' builtin and intrinsic support (PR #79768)

Joseph Huber via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 29 11:44:48 PST 2024


================
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ def : Proc<"sm_61", [SM61, PTX50]>;
 def : Proc<"sm_62", [SM62, PTX50]>;
 def : Proc<"sm_70", [SM70, PTX60]>;
 def : Proc<"sm_72", [SM72, PTX61]>;
-def : Proc<"sm_75", [SM75, PTX63]>;
+def : Proc<"sm_75", [SM75, PTX62, PTX63]>;
----------------
jhuber6 wrote:

Okay, so I can just get rid of it for this definition and it will still work? I could've just said it came with 63 and been lazy I suppose.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79768


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list