[llvm] [AsmPrinter][DebugNames] Implement DW_IDX_parent entries (PR #77457)

[Alexander Yermolovich via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -496,15 +549,32 @@ void Dwarf5AccelTableWriter::emitAbbrevs() const {
 }
 
 void Dwarf5AccelTableWriter::emitEntry(
-    const DWARF5AccelTableData &Entry) const {
+    const DWARF5AccelTableData &Entry,
+    const DenseMap<uint64_t, MCSymbol *> &DIEOffsetToAccelEntryLabel,
+    DenseSet<MCSymbol *> &EmittedAccelEntrySymbols) const {
   std::optional<DWARF5AccelTable::UnitIndexAndEncoding> EntryRet =
       getIndexForEntry(Entry);
-  uint32_t AbbrvTag = constructAbbreviationTag(Entry.getDieTag(), EntryRet);
+  std::optional<uint64_t> MaybeParentOffset = Entry.getParentDieOffset();
+  std::optional<dwarf::Form> MaybeParentForm =
+      getFormForIdxParent(IndexedOffsets, MaybeParentOffset);
+  uint32_t AbbrvTag =
+      constructAbbreviationTag(Entry.getDieTag(), EntryRet, MaybeParentForm);
   auto AbbrevIt = Abbreviations.find(AbbrvTag);
   assert(AbbrevIt != Abbreviations.end() &&
          "Why wasn't this abbrev generated?");
   assert(getTagFromAbbreviationTag(AbbrevIt->first) == Entry.getDieTag() &&
          "Invalid Tag");
+
+  auto EntrySymbolIt = DIEOffsetToAccelEntryLabel.find(Entry.getDieOffset());
----------------
ayermolo wrote:

With split dwarf we can have multiple DIEs with the same offset. Won't this potentially return the wrong label, or am I missing something?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77457